This essay, on the violence n South Africa, was my Observer column this week. (The column included also a short piece on the GB News debacle) It was published on 18 July 2021, under the headline “Gross inequality stoked the violence in South Africa. It’s a warning to us all”.
“It feels qualitatively different this time.” There are few people I know in South Africa who don’t think this about the carnage now engulfing the nation. Violence was institutionalised during the years of apartheid. In the post-apartheid years, it has rarely been far from the surface – police violence, gangster violence, the violence of protest. What is being exposed now, however, is just how far the social contract that has held the nation together since the end of apartheid has eroded.
Many aspects of the disorder are peculiar to South Africa. There are also themes with wider resonance. Events in the country demonstrate in a particularly acute fashion a phenomenon we are witnessing in different ways and in different degrees of severity across the globe: the old order breaking down, with little to fill the void but sectarian movements or identity politics.
The immediate cause of the violence was the 15-month sentence imposed on former president Jacob Zuma for refusing to testify at a corruption inquiry. The protests in Zuma’s stronghold of KwaZulu-Natal have, however, morphed into something bigger and more menacing. A combination of people made desperate by poverty and hunger, gangsters seeking to profit from mayhem and political activists settling scores has brought unparalleled turmoil to the country.
Corruption may have ensnared Zuma, but it’s not confined to Zuma. In a country in which politics is defined by state patronage, corruption is a central feature. It has allowed for a tiny black middle class to join the ranks of already-rich whites. And, together with social and economic policies that largely benefit the wealthy, it has also helped create the most unequal society in the world.
More than half the population lives in poverty, a quarter in extreme poverty. Unemployment stands at more than 32%. Among youth, three out of four are jobless.
All this has been exacerbated by Covid, devastating lockdowns and government incompetence. Over the past year, almost two-thirds of households had run out of money to buy food in the previous month and almost one in five experienced weekly hunger. And this was before the government stopped Covid relief payments, which will make desperation even more unbearable.
And then there is police violence. In the year 2019/20, there were 629 deaths at the hands of the police and 216 cases of alleged torture. South African police appear proportionately to kill more than twice as many people as their American counterparts. Yet, while global attention has, rightly, been paid to police killings of African Americans, the far more ferocious police violence in South Africa has received much less interest – even within the country. Black lives often matter less, but some black lives seem to matter less than others.
For South Africa’s black population, hopelessness and rage arise from the sense that everything has changed and yet so little has. Apartheid has gone. Black people have the vote. For many, though, the country has, in material terms, barely advanced. Apartheid had an immensely dehumanising impact on communities, but it helped to forge social bonds and channel anger into the movement for liberation. The dehumanising effect of post-apartheid policies has served only to erode the social fabric.
As the failure to tackle poverty has eroded support for the ANC, it has responded by leaning more into the politics of division, leading people to turn their anger at each other. There have been waves of violence, directed against migrant workers, much of it stoked by politicians. Many have also exploited divisions between apartheid-defined categories of people, such as “blacks”, “coloureds” and “Indians”.
The black population is the primary victim of inequality: 64% of black people live in poverty compared with just 1% of white people. Nevertheless, inequality is an issue not of race but of class: the main divisions now lie within the black population. As the World Bank’s Report on Inequality puts it, “increasing inequality within the black and Asian/Indian population” has “prevented any decline in total inequality”. In a political process built on sectarianism and racial and ethnic division, it’s a narrative few politicians want to pursue. Even radical movements that claim to speak for the masses, such as the Economic Freedom Fighters, still frame the issue as a racial conflict between black and white.
In response to the violence, local organisations have sprung up to help clean up the mess, distribute food and medicines, protect the community. Optimists see this as a spark for a new kind of politics. Pessimists fear they will be engulfed by the same sectarianism that shapes so much of politics.
What is happening in the country is a tragedy for the people of South Africa. It is also a warning for the rest of us.
Like many outsiders you are mischaracterising South Africa.
My brother lives in the Western Cape and I asked him if he was ok.
“For the moment we are ok. Western cape is a little different to other provinces in that we have a DA government and not ANC. The dynamics in this country are quite complex. Poverty, crime & umemployment are big factors. Whilst the rest of the world looks in and still blames the “white” regime, we sit back and watch the corruption which basically “shits” on their own doorstep. What rational person burns down their own facilities, their own livelyhoods and then complains they are hungry after they have consumed all of their looted food. You can only live here to understand. The very people who pay taxes are driven away. How does that make sense”.
Clearly the problem is ANC corruption and the extent to which affected provinces are then driven by their amygdala.
This is what structural prejudism really looks like. Meanwhile, highly prejudiced ANC like organisations like the Runnymede Trust continuously deploy ‘monolithic racial categories’ and then claim they are not trying to divide societies using scientific racism.
The epitome of bad faith pluralism, cognitive corruption and gaslighting.
Imagine the likes of the Runnymede Trust running the country. ANC comes to Britain.
Your view that Kenan has ‘mischaracterised’ South African would appear to be essentially that those who see things a binary racial terms are right, they’ve just placed blame on the wrong side.
No sensible person would doubt the negative impact of ANC corruption, but your argument seems to suggest that any analysis should simply stop there.
I would argue trying to apportion blame on the basis of binary racial categories is deeply fallacious and self serving.
The facts are clear.
Despite the promise of “Jobs, jobs, jobs!”, unemployment under 27 years of ANC rule has soared from
1,698,000 > 3,321,000 > 11.4 million
Tribalism > Corruption > Crony capitalism > Failed State Province
These same dynamics would have resulted in the same consequences in any self determining territory, whether the racial majority was black, white, brown or olive.