Pandaemonium

‘I DON’T HAVE TO BE WHAT YOU WANT ME TO BE’

Ali by Gordon Parks

‘A strange fate befell Muhammad Ali in the 1990s’, Mike Marqusee writes in Redemption Song, his wonderful, illuminating study of ‘Muhammad Ali and the Spirit of the Sixties’. ‘The man who had defied the American establishment was taken into its bosom. There he was lavished with an affection which had been strikingly absent thirty years before, when for several years he reigned unchallenged as the most reviled figure in the history of American sports.’

The global outpouring of grief, affection and tribute to Ali this weekend  has been moving and heart-warming. Yet, there is a part of me that thinks that, as affection has washed away the old contempt with which he once was greeted by large sections, especially of American society, we have also lost something of the sense of Ali’s true greatness. It is not that I would rather that Ali be treated with contempt than with affection – far from it. Nor is it that Ali’s brashness and braggadocio, his opposition to the Vietnam War, or his support for the Nation of Islam, have been ignored in the thousands of eulogies this weekend. It is rather that, as Ali’s biographer Thomas Hauser observed, so much effort has been spent trying to sanitise Ali that we are danger of forgetting the real man and his real courage. It is also that we have moved so far from the world that created Muhammad Ali that it is difficult properly to comprehend the hatred and revulsion that once greeted him, or the radicalism and hope that he embodied.

There is a danger, too, of sanctifying Ali, of according him mythical status, and so depriving him of his real humanity. He was a man of great contradictions and, like all human beings, of deep flaws. He was one of the greatest symbols of black pride, and yet, as Arthur Ashe said of his run-ins with Sonny Liston and Floyd Paterson, ‘No black athlete had ever spoken so disparagingly to another black athlete’.  He was proud of his accomplishments as a fighter, and yet also deeply ambivalent about his role in the ring, describing boxing as ‘a lot of white men watching two black men beat each other up’.  He was an icon of the civil rights movement yet pledged allegiance to the Nation of Islam, an organization that despised the movement and the ‘integration agenda’. He prized friendship and loyalty, yet treated his friend and mentor Malcolm X with cruel disdain after the latter broke with the Nation of Islam.

Ali defeats lLston by Gordon Parks

Part of Ali’s greatness, however, was his ability to reveal all his contradictions and flaws, and yet also to transcend them. Listening now, in an age which most boxers are merely loudmouth journeymen, to Ali’s great, boastful tirades, the ‘Louisville Lip’ may sound similarly tiresome. But that is not to understand the context of his swagger. In an age of Jim Crow laws and brutal lynchings, for a young black man to stand up and proclaim his greatness, defy convention, refuse to be humble or to know his place, was an incomparable act of bravery and defiance. It was a means of turning the world on its head, of demonstrating that through strength of will and force of personality, it was possible to force people to look upon the world – to look upon you – differently. As Ali put it:

I am America. I am the part you won’t recognize. But get used to me. Black, confident, cocky; my name, not yours; my religion, not yours; my goals, my own; get used to me.

Ali’s support for the reactionary National of Islam may, from today’s perspective, seem disturbing. But, again, in the context of the treatment of African Americans in the 1960s, it was a bold insistence on being able to define his own identity, and not allowing himself to be constrained by a deeply racist society and by his ‘slave name’. The day after he defeated Sonny Liston to become world champion for the first time,  Ali held a press conference in which he formally announced that he had joined the Nation of Islam (he had secretly been a member for two years). ‘I don’t have to be what you want me to be’, he told the assembled media. ‘I’m free to be what I want.’ ‘I don’t have to be what you want me to be’. Nothing better summed up the Muhammad Ali of the 1960s, or why he drew upon himself such opprobrium and contempt from the establishment, or why, for so many, he was such a symbol of aspiration and hope.

‘The danger in the mind of most white Americans’, James Baldwin wrote in The Fire Next Time, published the year before Ali beat Liston, ‘is the loss of their identity… Any upheaval in the universe is terrifying because it so profoundly attacks one sense of one’s own reality. Well, the black man has functioned in the white man’s world as a fixed star, as an immovable pillar; and as he moves out of his place, heaven and earth are shaken to their foundations.’ And a black man like Muhammad Ali moving ‘out of his place’ appeared to many truly terrifying. Boxing, wrote Jimmy Canon, the doyen of ringside writers, had never before ‘been turned into an instrument of mass hate… Clay is using it as a weapon of wickedness.’

Ali Frazier

Ali’s refusal of the draft to fight in Vietnam was a courageous stance. His willingness to stand by his decision, despite the authorities stripping him of his world title, his boxing licence, his passport and almost his liberty (he was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment for draft evasion, the conviction eventually being overturned  by the Supreme Court  after a four-year legal battle), was an act of great principle. ‘Why should they ask me to put on a uniform and go 10,000 miles from home and drop bombs and bullets on brown people in Vietnam while so-called Negro people in Louisville are treated like dogs and denied simple human rights?’ he asked. ‘The real enemy of my people’, he continued, ‘is right here. I will not disgrace my religion, my people or myself by becoming a tool to enslave those who are fighting for their own justice, freedom and equality’.

As a child growing up in 1970s Britain, Ali had a special place in my heart. It was a Britain very different from that of today. Racism then was vicious, visceral and often fatal. Stabbings were everyday facts of life, firebombings almost weekly events, and murders all too common. I went to a largely-white school, and it seemed to me an almost given part of life that daily I had physically to defend my dignity. Coming home with a bruised lip or a black eye was a given part of life, too. It wasn’t Muhammad Ali who taught me about defiance and pride. But it was Muhammad Ali who provided me with the greatest symbol of such defiance and pride.

‘No Vietcong ever called me nigger.’ It was a phrase that I carried with me through my teenage years. Whether Muhammad Ali said those exact words has been over the years a matter of much debate. In an interview in the magazine  Black Scholar, Ali  observed ‘they never lynched you, never called you nigger, never put dogs on you’.  ‘Man I ain’t got no quarrel with the Vietcong’, he told the New York Times. The line ‘No Vietcong ever called me nigger’, has, however, always proved elusive to pin down.  But, apocryphal or not, it summed up for me, as it did for so many people, my Muhammad Ali, the phrase that more than most defined for me his attitude, and bound me to my image of him.

Ali by Thomas Hoepker Magnum

Ali brought an uncommon grace to the most brutal of sports, and a wit and poise too rarely seen before or since in sporting banter. What really defined Ali, though, was not his skill in the ring or his eloquence outside it. It was his attitude, his insistence that ‘I don’t have to be what you want me to be. I’m free to be what I want.’

Ali was, as Mike Marqusee observes at the end of Redemption Song, ‘breathtaking in the ring and irresistibly seductive outside it’, possessed of  talents ‘quite beyond emulation’. But his ‘real heroism’ Marqusee adds, ‘lies in actions we can all emulate: in placing solidarity with humans in remote lands above loyalty to any national government, in setting conscience above personal convenience’.

It is worth recalling Ali’s words on refusing to fight in Vietnam:

I am proud of the title ‘World Heavyweight Champion’ which I won in the ring in Miami on February 25, 1964. The holder of it should at all times have the courage of convictions and carry out those convictions, not only in the ring but throughout all phases of his life. It is in light of my own personal convictions that I take my stand in rejecting the call to be inducted into the armed services. I do so with full realization of its implications and possible consequences.

Ali did not ‘dodge the draft’. He defied it, knowing full well the consequences, and being willing to live with them. It is that sense of inner conviction, and refusal to bow to fashion or to authority, that best defines Ali’s greatness.

.

The photos are of Muhammad Ali by Gordon Parks; Ali flooring Sonny Liston by Gordon Rooney; Ali and Joe Frazier by Bettman/Corbis; Ali by Thomas Hoepker/Magnum.

5 comments

  1. Georgina Turner

    Muhammad Ali and James Baldwin represent different levels of thought, but they shared a courage to express their convictions.

  2. Fayyaz

    Thanks for removing the artificial coat and showing real Muhammad Ali, which was much taller than the sanctified Ali.

Comments are closed.